Source: Washington Post
The Supreme Court does its job for once and reminds GW, that even though he thinks he's the decider, as the sitting president, he must still abide by the laws Congress sets forth.
Hail judicial oversight and our wonderful system of checks and balances.
For five years, President Bush waged war as he saw fit. If intelligence officers needed to eavesdrop on overseas telephone calls without warrants, he authorized it. If the military wanted to hold terrorism suspects without trial, he let them.
Now the Supreme Court has struck at the core of his presidency and dismissed the notion that the president alone can determine how to defend the country. In rejecting Bush's military tribunals for terrorism suspects, the high court ruled that even a wartime commander in chief must govern within constitutional confines significantly tighter than this president has believed appropriate.
For many in Washington, the decision echoed not simply as matter of law but as a rebuke of a governing philosophy of a leader who at repeated turns has operated on the principle that it is better to act than to ask permission. This ethos is why many supporters find Bush an inspiring leader, and why many critics in this country and abroad react so viscerally against him....
"There is a strain of legal reasoning in this administration that believes in a time of war the other two branches have a diminished role or no role," San. Lindsey O. Graham (R-S.C.), who has resisted the administration's philosophy, said in an interview. "It's sincere, it's heartfelt, but after today, it's wrong."
Tags: [Ruling Emphasizes Constitutional Boundaries], [the Supreme Court], [A Governing Philosophy Rebuffed], [the Court held that Common Article 3 of Geneva applies as a matter of treaty obligation to the conflict against Al Qaeda], [the CIA's interrogation regime is unlawful], [violate the War Crimes Act], [The Supreme Court ruled Thursday that President Bush overstepped his authority in ordering military war crimes trials for Guantanamo Bay detainees], [Geneva Conventions], [Ahmed Hamdan], [Osama bin Laden], [Guantanamo Bay], [President Bush], [war on terror]
No comments:
Post a Comment